• A scale free network is a network whose degree distribution follows a power law. The term scale-free comes from how power laws are scale invariant
  • Most models under Preferential Attachment can generate scale-free networks
  • We have several Models for Scale Free Networks

Properties

Large Hubs

  • In a large scale-free network, the biggest hubs are orders of magnitude larger than the smallest nodes in the networks.

  • Let us use the natural cutoff of the continuous power law distribution of a scale-free network.

    We have the following distribution

    Let us assume that in a network of nodes, we expect at most one node that has degree bigger than .

    We, therefore, have that

    Or expanding the integral

    Which, when evaluated gives

    This implies that has a polynomial dependence on , so large scale-free networks have disproportionately large hubs.

Low Attack Tolerance

  • For scale free networks , there is a phase transition at an incredibly low value for targeted attacks. This is because hubs play an important role in keeping the network connected.

    It only takes the removal of a few hubs for the network to fragment.

  • Within a network, the removal of a single node is unlikely to fragment the network However, targeted attacks can disconnect the network and cause it to break down into tiny clusters.

  • The robustness of scale free networks , combined with the modifications of an attack on a scale free network give us that the breakdown thresholds for attacks on a scale-free network is the solution to this

  • We can make the following observations

    • increases for small degree exponents and decreases for large degree exponents.
    • for attacks is always smaller than that for random failures.
    • For large , the scale free network behaves like a random network under attack. At large , the attack and failure thresholds converge to each other and they become indistinguishable.

Thresholds

  • The degree exponent introduces a threshold on the scale-free network. in particular on the average distance

    We have that

  • We may see that the scale-free property has the following characteristics.

    • Smaller average path lengths since hubs act as bridges between many nodes.
    • Networks become ultra-small. The smaller the degree exponent , the shorter the distances between the nodes.
    • If , the scale-free network now exhibits the same properties as a small-world network.
    • If , the giant component emerges (see here).

Anomalous Region

  • By the calculations here, we find that when ,
  • This region is anomalous, because the average degree diverges as . But also, the largest hub must connect to more nodes than there are links in the network.
  • Thus, large scale-free networks with that lack multiple edges cannot exist.

Ultra-Small World

  • This region is characterized by being Ultra small since grows much slower than .

  • This is indicative of the fact that hubs significantly reduce the distance between any two nodes.

  • In this case, , where so the proportion of nodes connected to the largest hub decreases as

Critical Point

  • At , we encounter a critical point where the dependence to returns, yet this is corrected by the presence of . This means, that it is on the verge of displaying the small world property

Small World

  • Here, we find the network satisfies the small network property.
  • While hubs remain, they are not sufficiently large or numerous to have a significant impact on the distance between nodes.
  • For all intents and purposes, the properties of a scale-free network here are hard to distinguish from that of a small-world network. In theory, however, we can achieve this by having
    In practice, no real network is that big.

Percolation

  • The critical exponents of a scale-free network are determined as follows.

  • The average cluster size near follows

    This emerges due to the Average distance thresholds.

  • The order parameter critical exponent is given by

    • In a scale-free network, the giant component collapses faster around than a random network.
  • The average size off the finite components is given by

    Missing \end{split} \begin{equation} \begin{split}

v &= \begin{cases} \frac{\gamma-3}{\gamma - 2} & 3 <\gamma < 4 \ \frac{3-\gamma}{\gamma -2} & 2 < \gamma < 3 \ \end{cases} \end{split} \end{equation}

You can't use 'macro parameter character #' in math mode # Links * [[Network Science by Barabasi|Barabasi]] * [[Random Network]] * [[Fundamental Constructs of Network Science]]