For scale free networks , there is a phase transition at an incredibly low value for targeted attacks. This is because hubs play an important role in keeping the network connected.
It only takes the removal of a few hubs for the network to fragment.
Within a network, the removal of a single node is unlikely to fragment the network However, targeted attacks can disconnect the network and cause it to break down into tiny clusters.
The robustness of scale free networks , combined with the modifications of an attack on a scale free network give us that the breakdown thresholds for attacks on a scale-free network is the solution to this
We can make the following observations
increases for small degree exponents and decreases for large degree exponents.
for attacks is always smaller than that for random failures.
For large , the scale free network behaves like a random network under attack. At large , the attack and failure thresholds converge to each other and they become indistinguishable.
This region is anomalous, because the average degree diverges as . But also, the largest hub must connect to more nodes than there are links in the network.
Thus, large scale-free networks with that lack multiple edges cannot exist.
At , we encounter a critical point where the dependence to returns, yet this is corrected by the presence of . This means, that it is on the verge of displaying the small world property
Here, we find the network satisfies the small network property.
While hubs remain, they are not sufficiently large or numerous to have a significant impact on the distance between nodes.
For all intents and purposes, the properties of a scale-free network here are hard to distinguish from that of a small-world network. In theory, however, we can achieve this by having
You can't use 'macro parameter character #' in math mode # Links * [[Network Science by Barabasi|Barabasi]] * [[Random Network]] * [[Fundamental Constructs of Network Science]]